Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

20

CLIMATE ROUNDTABLE - TOWARDS A GREENER FUTURE

1.

Social impact

. These include factors such as health risks,

the risks of nuclear power accidents, water consumption of

nuclear and coal plants, and potential declines in the price of

property in the case of renewables.

2.

Transmission costs

. In the case of renewables, grids must

often be reinforced as power sources such as offshore wind or

solar are usually not centrally located. Clearly such costs must

be reflected in an accurate measurement.

3.

Variability costs.

These include payments to keep gas power

plants, for example, on stand-by as backup capacity for variable

renewable energy sources.

4.

Employment effects

. Generating electricity creates jobs and

value – but some types of energy production are more labour

intensive during the construction phase, while others create

more jobs through installation and maintenance.

5.

Geopolitical risk

. Some energy sources can serve as a

hedge against price increases or political interference. Wind,

for example, has no fuel price and cannot be manipulated by

adverse foreign parties.

6.

Environmental impact

. The cost of CO

2

is already reflected

in LCoE. At present, however, CO

2

costs are exceptionally low

and do not accurately reflect the impact of emissions on the

environment or on air quality.

SCoE takes these factors into account, resulting in a more

meaningful and accurate cost measurement system.

A traditional LCoE calculation demonstrates that onshore wind

power is already close to being cost-competitive today, and that

offshore wind is rapidly becoming more competitive.

When one applies the more comprehensive SCoE measurement,

the viability of wind becomes even more pronounced. Looking

ahead to 2025, one sees that wind power, both onshore and

offshore, will be the single most inexpensive source for power

generation, with natural gas the most cost-efficient backup for

variable renewable sources.

While market mechanisms like CO

2

pricing and emission

trading schemes (ETS) should be the adequate means to

drive investment decisions towards lower SCoE, so far they

have not demonstrated that they work with sufficient impact.

Until these deficiencies are overcome, binding targets for

renewables are needed.

The future development of wind power will be increasingly driven

by economic factors. Therefore, it is crucial that we have an

accurate and comprehensive method of calculating true costs.

SCoE can provide this, helping investors, policy makers, and the

public to better understand our true energy picture and to make

the best decisions going forward.

The single greatest challenge remains

making CO

2

-free power sources and CO

2

-

free renewable energy sources more economically

competitive. This demands accurate measurement

of the costs of competing energy sources.

Markus Tacke,

Siemens AG